Social Psychology Network

Maintained by Scott Plous, Wesleyan University

Jon E. Grahe

Jon E. Grahe

  • Media Contact
  • SPN Mentor

The era of meta-science using crowdsourcing has arrived. There are multiple options to choose from now. However, very few are specifically designed for students as contributors. If you teach research methods or mentor undergraduates conducting research, consider participating in the Collaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP; or the Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions 2 (EAMMi2;

Consider the following alternative system for conducting undergraduate research in psychology. Imagine research students from around the country conducting their independent and senior capstone research projects focused on a question that you personally find to be critically relevant. Each year, students could select topics from a short list of “Critical Questions” identified by the discipline (i.e., APS, SPSP) and published in late spring. In the following year when they complete their research, the data could be submitted to a web-portal that you could freely access and analyze. With over 90,000 seniors graduating nationally across the US with a psychology major and about 25 % completing a research project including some kind of empirical data collection, even a meager participation rate would yield a wealth of research that could immensely benefit the field of psychology.

The advantages relate to both pedagogy and theory in psychology. While obstacles are numerous for implementing such a system, it would require relatively minor shifts and additions to the resources we currently expense for undergraduate research training and the added benefits to our students’ education and the experience of faculty who guide undergraduate research far outweigh the costs. Further, consider benefits for undergraduate and graduate student training in quantitative methods accessing data representing diverse projects from multiple institutions across broad geographical regions. Finally, the data would allow for tests of competing theories that could advance the field generally.

As with any radical idea, our established system will be resistant to this change, even though we have the technological and management resources to implement an alternative system of psychological research. I am currently developing alternative models to implement collective undergraduate research projects and would like input from the field about the perceived value and difficulty involved. I would also like to hear from people who are interested in trying to pretest such a system.

Please email me at with any comments you have about this idea, whether supportive or critical. As with all requests, I promise to summarize the responses.

Primary Interests:

  • Culture and Ethnicity
  • Nonverbal Behavior
  • Person Perception
  • Research Methods, Assessment

Research Group or Laboratory:

Note from the Network: The holder of this profile has certified having all necessary rights, licenses, and authorization to post the files listed below. Visitors are welcome to copy or use any files for noncommercial or journalistic purposes provided they credit the profile holder and cite this page as the source.

Image Gallery


Journal Articles:

Other Publications:

  • Grahe, J. E. (2017). Authentic research projects benefit atudents, their instructors, and science. In R. Obeid, A. Schartz, C. Shane-Simpson, & P. J. Brooks (Eds.) How We Teach Now: The GSTA Guide to Student-Centered Teaching. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology web site:

Courses Taught:

Jon E. Grahe
Department of Psychology
Pacific Lutheran University
1010 121st S Street
Tacoma, Washington 98447
United States

  • Phone: (253) 535-7394

Send a message to Jon E. Grahe

Note: You will be emailed a copy of your message.

Psychology Headlines

From Around the World

News Feed (35,797 subscribers)